|
||||
|
To The Mapping Officer
Existing maps are the neglected assets of orienteering.
I used to work in computer software. New projects were the glamour jobs. Maintaining
software - fixing bugs and making minor extensions - was seen as humdrum.
Maps are the same. Clubs commission photogrammetry and mapping for a new
map which will be used at a major event. The club's best planners will set the courses.
Meanwhile, month in, month out, old maps are used for club events, even OYs.
This is where inexperienced planners learn their stuff. On maps full of errors!
Do you wonder why its hard to get planners?
The errors may have many sources:
|
|||
|
RECOMMENDATION...
My work is increasingly revising existing maps. It's not
just adding and deleting features and changing the vegetation. Often features are in the
wrong relationship and you have to decide which one is to be trusted.
My methods go back to checking the block pattern
and often distortion is evident. Whole groups of features may have to be squeezed and
stretched. This in the computer before setting foot on the ground. A by-product is that the map
is related to the NZ grid.
Only when you know the block boundaries are right is it worth doing fieldwork revision.
Send me the OCAD file and a brief statement of what you see as the major problems,
and I'll make some guesses about what a fixup might take. If you know the origin of the
basemap, tell me that too.
This revision might be more valuable to your club health than a new map. New maps are used for
major events benefitting members of other clubs!
Yours in orienteering,
|
||||